Fractional Ownership Sports Cards Failure

Published: December 31, 2025

⏱️ 12 min read

Track Your Collection with
Hall of Cards

Want to keep track of your sports cards and manage your collection? Download our free app to scan cards, track values, and stay updated with the latest market trends.

Download Now

Table of Contents

Introduction: The Promise That Couldn’t Deliver

In 2020, fractional ownership platforms promised to revolutionize sports card investing. Rally, Otis, and Dibbs claimed they would “democratize” access to million-dollar cards, allowing everyday collectors to own shares of a 1952 Mickey Mantle or T206 Honus Wagner for just $50. Investors could buy shares like stocks, trade them freely, and profit as card values appreciated. It sounded perfect—until it wasn’t. By late 2024, the verdict is clear: fractional investing in sports cards “has been a total failure,” according to industry analysis. Here’s what went wrong, and what collectors should learn from this cautionary tale.

Key Takeaways:

  • Fractional ownership platforms like Rally, Otis, and Dibbs failed due to overvaluation at 2020-2021 bubble peaks, zero secondary market liquidity, and excessive fees consuming 15-25% of returns.
  • Most sports card assets on Rally are 50-70% underwater relative to purchase prices, with no buyers for shares when investors want to exit.
  • Otis was acquired by Public.com and liquidated most assets at losses, while Collectable shareholders found investments “held hostage” with no access after acquisition.
  • Better alternatives include buying lower-tier cards you can afford outright, graded modern rookies, card breaks, or complete sets—all providing better liquidity and actual ownership.
  • Physical card ownership provides superior control, liquidity, and returns compared to fractional shares, with ability to sell within 48 hours and keep 100% of appreciation minus reasonable selling fees.

The Fractional Ownership Pitch: Why It Seemed Brilliant

The concept was simple and appealing. High-end sports cards appreciate over time but cost $50,000-$5,000,000, excluding 99% of potential investors. Fractional platforms would purchase iconic cards, divide ownership into affordable shares ($10-100), and create a trading marketplace. As the card appreciated, so would your shares. When the platform eventually sold the card, shareholders would split profits proportionally.

Rally Road pioneered the model with classic cars, then expanded to cards, acquiring assets like a 1909 T206 Ty Cobb ($100,000+), various Michael Jordan rookies, and sealed wax boxes. Each asset was divided into 10,000-100,000 shares priced at $1-50 per share.

Otis positioned itself as “the stock market for culture,” offering shares in cards, sneakers, comic books, and memorabilia. The platform raised significant venture funding and partnered with major brands.

Dibbs targeted sports cards specifically, emphasizing faster liquidity and lower fees than competitors.

Collectable promised premium sports memorabilia with institutional-grade authentication and storage.

For a moment, it looked like the future of card investing.

What Actually Happened: The Slow-Motion Collapse

Within three years, the dream turned into a nightmare for most investors:

Overvaluation at Acquisition: Platforms purchased cards at peak 2020-2021 bubble prices. A Zion Williamson Prizm Silver PSA 10 purchased for $100,000 in early 2021 was worth $30,000 by late 2022. Rally bought assets at all-time highs, then watched values plummet 50-70% as the market corrected.

Zero Liquidity: The secondary marketplace for shares never materialized. Rally promised you could trade shares freely, but no buyers existed. Investors discovered they owned illiquid shares in overpriced assets they couldn’t exit. Traditional sports cards can be listed on eBay or sold to dealers within 48 hours—fractional shares might never find buyers.

Platform Pivots and Exits: When Public.com acquired Otis in March 2022, hopes rose for integration into a major investing app. Instead, Public liquidated most Otis assets and largely abandoned the alternative asset model. Dibbs quietly pivoted away from fractional ownership. Collectable’s buyout left investors unable to access their holdings—dozens of high-end collectibles effectively “held hostage.”

Fee Structures Eating Returns: Even when cards appreciated modestly, platform fees (acquisition fees, annual management fees, sale commissions) consumed 15-25% of potential returns. A 20% card appreciation might net investors just 5% after fees.

No Voting Rights or Control: Shareholders couldn’t force asset sales even when underwater. Platforms controlled timing, often holding depreciating assets indefinitely to avoid realizing losses.

Rally: Survivor With Underwater Assets

Rally remains operational in 2025, making it technically the “winner” among fractional platforms. However, most sports card assets on Rally are significantly underwater relative to purchase prices. Cards bought during the 2020-2021 boom remain overvalued compared to current market comps.

The platform has shifted focus back toward classic cars and away from cards, acknowledging implicitly that the sports card experiment failed. Long-time Rally investors in card assets face a painful choice: hold indefinitely hoping for recovery, or sell shares at 40-60% losses on the limited secondary market.

Some Rally assets have performed reasonably—vintage cards from pre-COVID acquisitions sometimes show modest gains—but the overall track record for sports cards is deeply negative.

Otis: Acquired and Dismantled

Otis represented the most promising platform with legitimate venture backing and sophisticated technology. The Public.com acquisition seemed like validation of the model. Instead, it proved the opposite.

Public discovered that alternative assets didn’t fit their core equities trading business. User engagement was low, liquidity was non-existent, and operational costs were high. Public systematically sold off most Otis assets, returning capital to shareholders—often at losses. The “stock market for culture” became a liquidation event.

For investors, the Otis story teaches a crucial lesson: platform sustainability matters more than slick marketing. Even well-funded startups can pivot away from business lines that don’t work.

Collectable: The Cautionary Tale of Locked Assets

Collectable’s collapse represents the worst-case scenario for fractional investors. After the company was acquired, shareholders found themselves unable to access their investments. High-end memorabilia—game-worn jerseys, signed bats, premium cards—sit in storage while investors have no clarity on when (or if) they’ll see their money back.

This situation highlights fractional ownership’s fundamental flaw: you don’t actually own the physical asset. You own a legal claim to a percentage of proceeds if and when the asset sells. If the platform fails, your “ownership” becomes meaningless. Traditional card collectors holding physical assets in their safes never face this risk.

Dibbs: Quiet Exit from Fractional Model

Dibbs recognized the model’s failure early and pivoted toward traditional card trading and marketplace services. The platform now focuses on facilitating peer-to-peer transactions rather than fractional ownership—essentially admitting defeat on their original thesis.

For early Dibbs investors in fractional cards, the exit experience varied, but few walked away with meaningful profits. The company’s pivot at least provided exit liquidity, unlike Collectable’s trapped shareholders.

Why Fractional Ownership Failed: The Core Problems

Problem 1: Sports Cards Are Already Accessible Unlike $2 million Ferraris or $50 million Basquiat paintings, sports cards have natural price tiers. Want exposure to Michael Jordan? Buy a $50 base card instead of fractional shares in a $500,000 rookie. The democratization narrative was a solution seeking a problem.

Problem 2: Volatile Asset + Illiquid Structure = Disaster Sports cards can swing 30-50% in value within months based on player performance, market sentiment, and grading controversies. Fractional platforms created a structure where rapid asset depreciation met zero exit liquidity. Individual card owners can cut losses quickly—fractional shareholders cannot.

Problem 3: Fee Drag Kills Returns A card you own personally that appreciates 30% nets you 30% (minus grading/shipping if selling). The same card in a fractional platform nets maybe 15-18% after all fees. Over multi-year holds, fee drag compounds devastatingly.

Problem 4: Misaligned Incentives Platforms made money on acquisition fees and management fees, not investment performance. They had incentive to acquire many assets (generating fees) rather than only great assets. Traditional dealers who stake their own capital have skin in the game—platforms didn’t.

Problem 5: Market Timing Every major fractional platform scaled sports card acquisitions during the 2020-2021 bubble—literally the worst possible timing. Buying at bubble peaks guaranteed underperformance. Individual collectors could exercise better timing discipline.

Smarter Alternatives for Budget-Conscious Collectors

If you want sports card exposure but lack capital for expensive singles, consider these proven alternatives:

Lower-Tier Cards of Key Players: A 2003 LeBron James Topps base card costs $200-400—affordable for most collectors and offers similar exposure to LeBron’s legacy as a fractional share in a $200,000 Chrome rookie. Learn about building value in your sports card collection with accessible cards.

Graded Modern Rookies: $50-200 buys PSA 10 rookies of promising young players. You own the physical asset, can sell instantly on eBay, and avoid platform fees. Check our complete guide to grading sports trading cards to maximize returns.

Complete Sets: Building complete base sets of flagship products costs $100-500 and provides diversified exposure to entire rookie classes. Consider hot rookies like Caitlin Clark or Cooper Flagg.

Card Group Breaks: Join breakers on Whatnot or Fanatics Live to buy into team slots for $20-100. You own whatever pulls you receive—no intermediary platform. Learn how to start a card breaking business on Whatnot yourself.

Modern Wax Boxes: Retail blaster boxes ($20-40) or hobby boxes ($100-300) offer entertainment value plus chance of hits. Worst case, you had fun opening packs.

Index Funds for Actual Stocks: If you want fractional ownership with liquidity, buy S&P 500 index funds. Historical returns beat sports cards without the volatility or fees.

Lessons for the Future of Sports Card Investing

The fractional ownership experiment teaches crucial lessons:

Own Physical Assets: Nothing replaces holding the actual card in your possession. Physical ownership provides security, liquidity, and control that financial instruments cannot.

Beware of Fancy Packaging: Slick apps and “democratization” marketing shouldn’t override fundamental business model analysis. If the fees don’t make sense, the investment won’t work.

Market Timing Matters: Entering at bubble peaks—whether individual cards or fractional shares—rarely works. Exercise patience and wait for favorable entry points.

Liquidity is Priceless: The ability to sell an asset within 48 hours at fair market value is worth more than theoretical upside in illiquid investments.

Platforms Fail, Cards Endure: Rally, Otis, Dibbs, and Collectable all struggled or failed. Meanwhile, physical cards from those same eras remain collectible and tradeable. Bet on assets, not platforms.

Are There Any Good Fractional Use Cases?

In fairness, fractional ownership might work for truly inaccessible assets—original game-worn jerseys, $10 million+ cards, one-of-one museum pieces. But even then, traditional card collectors are better served buying what they can afford outright rather than fractional shares of trophy assets they’ll never touch.

Perhaps institutional investors or ultra-high-net-worth collectors could use fractional platforms for diversification, but retail hobbyists should stay away.

Looking to expand your sports card knowledge? Check out these related guides:

Frequently Asked Questions

Why did fractional sports card ownership platforms fail?

Fractional platforms failed due to a combination of overvaluation at acquisition (buying cards at 2020-2021 bubble peaks), zero liquidity in secondary markets, excessive fees (15-25% of returns), misaligned incentives where platforms profited from fees rather than performance, and catastrophic market timing. Most cards purchased are now 50-70% underwater, with no buyers for shares when investors want to exit.

Is Rally still operational for sports cards?

Yes, Rally remains operational in 2025, making it technically the survivor among fractional platforms. However, most sports card assets on Rally are significantly underwater relative to purchase prices from the 2020-2021 boom. The platform has shifted focus back toward classic cars and away from cards, and long-time investors face holding indefinitely or selling at 40-60% losses.

What happened to Otis and Collectable?

Otis was acquired by Public.com in March 2022, which then liquidated most assets and abandoned the alternative asset model—shareholders often received returns at losses. Collectable’s situation is worse: after the company was acquired, shareholders found themselves unable to access their investments, with high-end memorabilia effectively “held hostage” in storage with no clarity on when they’ll see returns.

What are better alternatives to fractional card ownership?

Better alternatives include buying lower-tier cards of key players you can afford outright ($50-400), graded modern rookies you physically own, complete base sets ($100-500), joining card breaks on Whatnot ($20-100 per slot), or purchasing modern wax boxes. All provide better liquidity, lower fees, and actual ownership compared to fractional shares.

Can I still make money with fractional sports card platforms?

It’s highly unlikely. Most sports card assets on remaining platforms are underwater from 2020-2021 purchases, secondary markets have no buyers, and fee structures eat 15-25% of potential returns. Even if cards appreciate, platform fees and illiquidity make profitability nearly impossible. The model fundamentally doesn’t work for sports cards—physical ownership provides better returns with lower costs and complete control.

Conclusion: Trust Your Instincts, Own Your Cards

The rise and fall of fractional sports card ownership platforms serves as a reminder: if something seems too good to be true, it probably is. Democratizing access to million-dollar cards sounded revolutionary, but the execution failed on every level—overvaluation, illiquidity, excessive fees, and platform instability combined to lose investors money.

The good news? The traditional sports card market works beautifully. Buy cards you can afford, store them safely, sell when you want, and keep 100% of the appreciation (minus reasonable selling fees). No middleman, no management fees, no trapped capital. The fractional experiment failed, but physical card collecting thrives. Sometimes the old way is the best way.